THE CANONS OF DORT
formally titled The Decision of the
Synod of Dort
on the Five Main Points of Doctrine
in Dispute in the Netherlands
The
First Main Point of Doctrine
Divine
Election and Reprobation
Article
1- God's Right to Condemn All People
Article
2 - The Manifestation of God's Love
Article
3 - The Preaching of the Gospel
Article
4 - A Twofold Response to the Gospel
Article
5 - The Sources of Unbelief and of Faith
Article
6 - God's Eternal Decision
Article
8 - A Single Decision of Election
Article
9 - Election Not Based on Foreseen Faith
Article
10 - Election Based on God's Good Pleasure
Article
11 - Election Unchangeable
Article
12 - The Assurance of Election
Article
13 - The Fruit of this Assurance
Article
14 - Teaching Election Properly
Article
16 - Responses to the Teaching of Reprobation
Article
17 - The Salvation of the Infants of Believers
Article
18 - The Proper Attitude Toward Election and Reprobation
The
Second Main Point of Doctrine
Christ's
Death and Human Redemption Through It
Article
1 - The Punishment Which God's Justice Requires
Article
2 -The Satisfaction Made by Christ
Article
3 - The Infinite Value of Christ's Death
Article
4 - Reasons for This Infinite Value
Article
5 - The Mandate to Proclaim the Gospel to All
Article
6 - Unbelief Man's Responsibility
Article
8 - The Saving Effectiveness of Christ's Death
Article
9 - The Fulfillment of God's Plan
The
Third and Fourth Main Points of Doctrine
Human
Corruption, Conversion to God and the Way it Occurs
Article
1 - The Effect of the Fall on Human Nature
Article
2- The Spread of Corruption
Article
4 - The Inadequacy of the Light of Nature
Article
5 - The Inadequacy of the Law
Article
6 - The Saving Power of the Gospel
Article
7 - God's Freedom in Revealing the Gospel
Article
8 - The Serious Call of the Gospel
Article
9 - Human Responsibility for Rejecting the Gospel
Article
10 - Conversion as the Work of God
Article
11 - The Holy Spirit's Work in Conversion
Article
12 - Regeneration a Supernatural Work
Article
13 - The Incomprehensible Way of Regeneration
Article
14 - The Way God Gives Faith
Article
15 - Responses to God's Grace
Article
16 - Regeneration's Effect
Article
17 - God's Use of Means in Regeneration
The
Fifth Main Point of Doctrine
The
Perseverance of the Saints
Article
1 - The Regenerate Not Entirely Free from Sin
Article
2 - The Believer's Reaction to Sins of Weakness
Article
3 - God's Preservation of the Converted
Article
4 - The Danger of True Believers' Falling into Serious Sins
Article
5 - The Effects of Such Serious Sins
Article
6 - God's Saving Intervention
Article
7 - Renewal to Repentance
Article
8 - The Certainty of this Preservation
Article
9 - The Assurance of this Preservation
Article
10 - The Ground of This Assurance
Article
11 - Doubts Concerning this
Assurance
Article
12 - This Assurance as an Incentive to Godliness
Article
13 - Assurance No Inducement to Carelessness
Article
14 - God's Use of Means in Perseverance
Article
15 - Contrasting Reactions to the Teaching of Perseverance
Rejection
of False Accusations
The
Judgment Concerning Divine Predestination which the Synod declares to be in
Agreement with the Word of God and accepted till now in the Reformed Churches,
set forth in several articles
Since all people have sinned in Adam
and have come under the sentence of the curse and eternal death, God would have
done no one an injustice if it had been His will to leave the entire human race
in sin and under the curse, and to condemn them on account of their sin. As the apostle says: The
whole world is liable to the condemnation of God (Romans 3:19), All have sinned and are deprived of the
glory of God (Romans 3:23), and The
wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).*
But this is how God showed His
love: He sent His only begotten Son into
the world, so that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal
life.
In order that people may be brought to
faith, God mercifully sends proclaimers of this very joyful message to the
people He wishes and at the time He wishes.
By this ministry people are called to repentance and faith in Christ
crucified. For how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without someone
preaching? And how shall they preach
unless they have been sent? (Romans 10:1415).
*
All quotations from Scripture are translations of the original Latin
manuscript.
God's anger remains on those who do
not believe this gospel. But those who
do accept it and embrace Jesus the Saviour with a true and living faith are
delivered through Him from God's anger and from destruction, and receive the
gift of eternal life.
The cause or blame for this unbelief,
as well as for all other sins, is not at all in God, but in man. Faith in Jesus Christ, however, and salvation
through Him is a free gift of God. As
Scripture says, It is by grace you have
been saved, through faith, and this not from yourselves; it is a gift of God (Ephesians 2:8). Likewise:
It has been freely given to you to
believe in Christ (Philippians 1:29).
The fact that some receive from God
the gift of faith within time, and that others do not, stems from His eternal
decision. For all His works are known to God from eternity (Acts 15:18; Ephesians 1:11). In accordance with this decision He
graciously softens the hearts, however hard, of His chosen ones and inclines
them to believe, but by His just judgment He leaves in their wickedness and
hardness of heart those who have not been chosen. And in this especially is disclosed to us His
act__unfathomable, and as merciful as it is just__of distinguishing between
people equally lost. This is the well
known decision of election and reprobation revealed in God's Word. This decision the wicked, impure and unstable
distort to their own ruin, but it provides holy and godly souls with comfort
beyond words.
The
Decisions of the Synod of Dort on the Five Main Points of Doctrine in Dispute
in the Netherlands is popularly known as the Canons of Dort. It consists
of statements of doctrine adopted by the great Synod of Dort which met in the
city of Dordrecht in 1618-1619. Although
this was a national synod of the Reformed churches of the Netherlands, it had
an international character, since it was composed not only of Dutch delegates
but also of twentysix delegates from eight foreign countries.
The Synod of Dort was held in order to
settle a serious controversy in the Dutch churches initiated by the rise of
Arminianism. Jacob Arminius, a
theological professor at Leiden University, questioned the teaching of Calvin and
his followers on a number of important points.
After Arminius' death, his own followers presented their views on five
of these points in the Remonstrance of 1610.
In this document or in later more explicit writings, the Arminians
taught election based on foreseen faith, universal atonement, partial
depravity, resistible grace, and the possibility of a lapse from grace. In the Canons the Synod of Dort rejected
these views and set forth the Reformed doctrine on these points, namely,
unconditional election, limited atonement, total depravity, irresistible grace,
and the perseverance of saints.
The Canons have a special character
because of their original purpose as a judicial decision on the doctrinal
points in dispute during the Arminian controversy. (Continued next page)
Election
[or choosing] is God's unchangeable purpose by which He did the following:
Before the foundation of the world, by
sheer grace, according to the free good pleasure of His will, He chose in
Christ to salvation a definite number of particular people out of the entire
human race, which had fallen by its own fault from its original innocence into
sin and ruin. Those chosen were neither
better nor more deserving than the others, but lay with them in the common
misery. He did this in Christ, whom He
also appointed from eternity to be the mediator, the head of all those chosen,
and the foundation of their salvation.
And so He decided to give the chosen ones
to Christ to be saved, and to call and draw them effectively into Christ's
fellowship through His Word and Spirit.
In other words, He decided to
grant them true faith in Christ, to justify them, to sanctify them, and
finally, after powerfully preserving them in the fellowship of His Son, to
glorify them.
God did all this in order to
demonstrate His mercy, to the praise of the riches of His glorious grace.
As Scripture says, God chose us in Christ, before the
foundation of the world, so that we should be holy and blameless before Him
with love; He predestined us whom He
adopted as His children through Jesus Christ, in Himself, according to the good
pleasure of His will, to the praise of His glorious grace, by which He freely
made us pleasing to Himself in His beloved (Ephesians 1:46). And elsewhere, Those whom He predes-tined, He also called; and those whom He called, He also
justified; and those whom He justified,
He also glorified (Romans 8:30).
The original preface called them a
"judgment, in which both the true view, agreeing with God's Word,
concerning the aforesaid five points of doctrine is explained, and the false
view, disagreeing with God's Word, is rejected". The Canons also have a limited character in
that they do not cover the whole range of doctrine, but focus on the five
points of doctrine in dispute.
Each of the main points consists of a
positive and a negative part, the former being an exposition of the Reformed
doctrine on the subject, the latter a repudiation of the corresponding
errors. Although in form there are only
four points, we speak properly of five points, because the Canons were
structured to correspond to the five articles of the 1610 Remonstrance. Main Points 3 and 4 were combined into one,
always designated as Main Point III/IV.
The new translation of the Canons,
based on the only extant Latin manuscript among those signed at the Synod of
Dort, was adopted by the 1986 Synod of the Christian Reformed Church in North
America and accepted by the RCA Synod of 1991;
translation used by permission of the Christian Reformed Church in North
America. The biblical quotations are
translations from the original Latin and so do not always correspond to current
versions. Though not in the original
text, subheadings have been added to the positive articles and to the
conclusion in order to facilitate study of the Canons.
This election is not of many
kinds; it is one and the same election
for all who were to be saved in the Old and the New Testament. For Scripture declares that there is a single
good pleasure, purpose, and plan of God's will, by which He chose us from
eternity both to grace and to glory, both to salvation and to the way of salvation,
which He prepared in advance for us to walk in.
This same election took place, not on the basis of foreseen faith, of the
obedience of faith, of holiness, or of any other good quality and disposition, as
though it were based on a prerequisite cause or condition in the person to be
chosen, but rather for the purpose of
faith, of the obedience of faith, of holiness, and so on. Accordingly, election is the source of each
of the benefits of salvation. Faith,
holiness, and the other saving gifts, and at last eternal life itself, flow
forth from election as its fruits and effects.
As the apostle says, He chose us
(not because we were, but) so that we
should be holy and blameless before Him in love (Ephesians 1:4).
But the cause of this undeserved
election is exclusively the good pleasure of God. This does not involve His choosing certain
human qualities or actions from among all those possible as a condition of
salvation, but rather involves His adopting certain particular persons from
among the common mass of sinners as His own possession. As Scripture says, When the children were not yet born, and had done nothing, either good
or bad..., she (Rebecca) was told,
"The older will serve the younger".
As it is written, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated"
(Romans 9:1113). Also, All who were appointed for eternal life
believed (Acts 13:48).
Just as God Himself is most wise, unchangeable,
allknowing, and almighty, so the election made by Him can neither be suspended
nor altered, revoked, or annulled;
neither can His chosen ones be cast off, nor their number reduced.
Assurance of this their eternal and
unchangeable election to salvation is given to the chosen in due time, though
by various stages and in differing measure.
Such assurance comes not by inquisitive searching into the hidden and
deep things of God, but by noticing within themselves, with spiritual joy and
holy delight, the unmistakable fruits of election pointed out in God's
Word__such as a true faith in Christ, a childlike fear of God, a godly sorrow
for their sins, a hunger and thirst for righteousness, and so on.
In their awareness and assurance of
this election God's children daily find greater cause to humble themselves
before God, to adore the fathomless depth of His mercies, to cleanse
themselves, and to give fervent love in return to Him who first so greatly
loved them. This is far from saying that
this teaching concerning election, and reflection upon it, make God's children
lax in observing His commandments or carnally selfassured. By God's just judgment this does usually happen
to those who casually take for granted the grace of election or engage in idle
and brazen talk about it but are unwilling to walk in the ways of the chosen.
Just as, by God's wise plan, this
teaching concerning divine election has been proclaimed through the prophets,
Christ Himself, and the apostles, in Old and New Testament times, and has
subsequently been committed to writing in the Holy Scriptures, so also today in
God's church, for which it was specifically intended, this teaching must be set
forth__with a spirit of discretion, in a godly and holy manner, at the
appropriate time and place, without inquisitive searching into the ways of the
Most High. This must be done for the
glory of God's most holy name, and for the lively comfort of His people.
Moreover, Holy Scripture most
especially highlights this eternal and undeserved grace of our election and
brings it out more clearly for us, in that it further bears witness that not all
people have been chosen but that some have not been chosen or have been passed
by in God's eternal election__those, that is, concerning whom God, on the basis
of His entirely free, most just, irreproachable and unchangeable good pleasure,
made the following decision:
to
leave them in the common misery into which, by their own fault, they have
plunged themselves;
not
to grant them saving faith and the grace of conversion;
but
finally to condemn and eternally punish them (having been left in their own ways
and under His
just
judgment), not only for their unbelief but also for all their other sins, in
order to display His justice.
And
this is the decision of reprobation, which does not at all make God the author
of sin (a blasphemous thought!) but rather its fearful, irreproachable, just
judge and avenger.
Those who do not yet actively
experience within themselves a living faith in Christ or an assured confidence
of heart, peace of conscience, a zeal for childlike obedience, and a glorying
in God through Christ, but who nevertheless use the means by which God has
promised to work these things in us__such people ought not to be alarmed at the
mention of reprobation, nor to count themselves among the reprobate; rather they ought to continue diligently in
the use of the means, to desire fervently a time of more abundant grace, and to
wait for it in reverence and humility.
On the other hand, those who seriously desire to turn to God, to be
pleasing to Him alone, and to be delivered from the body of death, but are not
yet able to make such progress along the way of godliness and faith as they
would like__such people ought much less to stand in fear of the teaching
concerning reprobation, since our merciful God has promised that He will not
snuff out a smouldering wick and that He will not break a bruised reed. However, those who have forgotten God and
their Saviour Jesus Christ and have abandoned themselves wholly to the cares of
the world and the pleasures of the flesh__such people have every reason to
stand in fear of this teaching, as long as they do not seriously turn to God.
Since we must make judgments about
God's will from His Word, which testifies that the children of believers are
holy, not by nature but by virtue of the gracious covenant in which they
together with their parents are included, godly parents ought not to doubt the
election and salvation of their children whom God calls out of this life in
infancy.
To those who complain about this grace of an undeserved election and about the severity of a just reprobation, we reply with the words
of
the apostle, Who are you, O man, to talk
back to God? (Romans 9:20), and with the words of our Saviour, Have I no right to do what I want with my
own? (Matthew 20:15). We, however,
with reverent adoration of these secret things, cry out with the apostle: Oh, the
depths of the riches both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments, and His
ways beyond tracing out! For who has
known the mind of the Lord? Or who has
been His counsellor? Or who has first
given to God, that God should repay him?
For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever! Amen (Romans 11:33-36).
Having set forth the orthodox teaching
concerning election and reprobation, the Synod rejects the errors of those:
Who teach that the will of God to save
those who would believe and persevere in faith and in the obedience of faith is
the whole and entire decision of election to salvation, and that nothing else
concerning this decision has been revealed in God's Word.
For they deceive the simple and
plainly contradict Holy Scripture in its testimony that God does not only wish
to save those who would believe, but that He has also from eternity chosen
certain particular people to whom, rather than to others, He would within time
grant faith in Christ and perseverance.
As Scripture says, I have revealed
Your name to those whom You gave Me (John 17:6). Likewise, All
who were appointed for eternal life believed (Acts 13:48), and He chose us before the foundation of the world
so that we should be holy... (Ephesians 1:4).
Who teach that God's election to
eternal life is of many kinds: one
general and indefinite, the other particular and definite, and the latter in
turn either incomplete, revocable, non-peremptory (or conditional), or else
complete, irrevocable and peremptory (or absolute). Likewise, who teach that there is one
election to faith and another to salvation, so that there can be an election to
justifying faith apart from a peremptory election to salvation.
For this is an invention of the human
brain, devised apart from the Scriptures, which distorts the teaching
concerning election and breaks up this golden chain of salvation: Those
whom He predestined, He also called; and
those whom He called, He also justified;
and those whom He justified, He also glorified (Romans 8:30).
Who teach that God's good pleasure and
purpose, which Scripture mentions in its teaching of election, does not involve
God's choosing certain particular people rather than others, but involves God's
choosing, out of all possible conditions (including the works of the law) or
out of the whole order of things, the intrinsically unworthy act of faith, as
well as the imperfect obedience of faith, to be a condition of salvation; and it involves His graciously wishing to
count this as perfect obedience and to look upon it as worthy of the reward of
eternal life.
For by this pernicious error the good
pleasure of God and the merit of Christ are robbed of their effectiveness and
people are drawn away, by unprofitable inquiries, from the truth of undeserved
justification and from the simplicity of the Scriptures. It also gives the lie to these words of the
apostle: God called us with a holy calling, not in virtue of works, but in
virtue of His own purpose and the grace which was given to us in Christ Jesus
before the beginning of time (2 Timothy 1:9).
Who teach that in election to faith a
prerequisite condition is that man should rightly use the light of nature, be
upright, unassuming, humble, and disposed to eternal life, as though election
depended to some extent on these factors.
For this smacks of Pelagius, and it
clearly calls into question the words of the apostle: We
lived at one time in the passions of our flesh, following the will of our flesh
and thoughts, and we were by nature children of wrath, like everyone else. But God, who is rich in mercy, out of the
great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in transgressions, made
us alive with Christ, by whose grace you have
been saved. And God raised us up with Him and seated us
with Him in heaven in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages we might
show the surpassing riches of His grace, according to His kindness toward us in
Christ Jesus. For it is by grace you
have been saved, through faith (and this not from yourselves; it is the gift of God) not by works, so that
no one can boast (Ephesians 2:39).
Who teach that the incomplete and
non-peremptory (or conditional) election of particular persons to salvation
occurred on the basis of a foreseen faith, repentance, holiness, and godliness,
which has just begun or continued for some time; but that complete and peremptory (or
absolute) election occurred on the basis of a foreseen perseverance to the end
in faith, repentance, holiness, and godliness.
And that this is the gracious and evangelical worthiness, on account of
which the one who is chosen is more worthy than the one who is not chosen. And therefore that faith, the obedience of
faith, holiness, godliness, and perseverance are not fruits or effects of an
unchangeable election to glory, but indispensable conditions and causes, which
are prerequisite in those who are to be chosen in the complete election, and
which are foreseen as achieved in them.
This runs counter to the entire
Scripture, which throughout impresses upon our ears and hearts these sayings
among others: Election is not by works, but by Him who calls (Romans
9:1112); All who were appointed for eternal life believed (Acts 13:48); He chose
us in Himself so that we should be holy (Ephesians 1:4); You did
not choose Me, but I chose you (John 15:16); If by
grace, not by works (Romans 11:6); In this is love, not that we loved God, but
that He loved us and sent His Son (1 John 4:10).
Who teach that not every election to
salvation is unchangeable, but that some of the chosen can perish and do in
fact perish eternally, with no decision of God to prevent it.
By
this gross error they make God changeable, destroy the comfort of the godly concerning
the steadfastness of their election, and contradict the Holy Scriptures, which
teach that the elect cannot be led astray
(Matthew 24:24), that Christ does not
lose those given to Him by the Father (John 6:39), and that those whom God predestined, called, and
justified, He also glorifies (Romans8:30).
Who teach that in this life there is
no fruit, no awareness, and no assurance of one's unchangeable election to
glory, except as conditional upon something changeable and contingent.
For not only is it absurd to speak of
an uncertain assurance, but these things also militate against the experience
of the saints, who with the apostle rejoice from an awareness of their election
and sing the praises of this gift of God;
who, as Christ urged, rejoice
with His disciples that their names have
been written in heaven (Luke 10:20);
and finally who hold up against the flaming arrows of the devil's
temptations the awareness of their election, with the question Who will bring any charge against those whom
God has chosen? (Romans 8:33).
Who teach that it was not on the basis
of His just will alone that God decided to leave anyone in the fall of Adam and
in the common state of sin and condemnation or to pass anyone by in the
imparting of grace necessary for faith and conversion.
For these words stand fast: He has
mercy on whom He wishes, and He hardens whom He wishes (Romans 9:18). And also:
To you it has been given to know
the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given
(Matthew 13:11). Likewise: I give
glory to You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that You have hidden these
things from the wise and understanding, and have revealed them to little
children; yes, Father, because that was
Your pleasure (Matthew 11:2526).
Who teach that the cause for God's
sending the gospel to one people rather than to another is not merely and
solely God's good pleasure, but rather that one people is better and worthier
than the other to whom the gospel is not communicated.
For Moses contradicts this when he
addresses the people of Israel as follows:
Behold, to Jehovah your God belong
the heavens and the highest heavens, the earth and whatever is in it. But Jehovah was inclined in His affection to
love your ancestors alone, and chose out their descendants after them, you
above all peoples, as at this day (Deuteronomy 10:1415). And also Christ: Woe to
you, Korazin! Woe to you,
Bethsaida! For if those mighty works
done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago
in sackcloth and ashes (Matthew11:21).
God is not only supremely merciful,
but also supremely just. His justice
requires (as He has revealed Himself in the Word) that the sins we have
committed against His infinite majesty be punished with both temporal and
eternal punishments, of soul as well as body.
We cannot escape these punishments unless satisfaction is given to God's
justice.
Since, however, we ourselves cannot
give this satisfaction or deliver ourselves from God's anger, God in His boundless
mercy has given us as a guarantee His only begotten Son, who was made to be sin
and a curse for us, in our place, on the cross, in order that He might give
satisfaction for us.
This death of God's Son is the only
and entirely complete sacrifice and satisfaction for sins; it is of infinite value and worth, more than
sufficient to atone for the sins of the whole world.
This death is of such great value and
worth for the reason that the person who suffered it is__as was necessary to be
our Saviour__ not only a true and perfectly holy man, but also the only
begotten Son of God, of the same eternal and infinite essence with the Father
and the Holy Spirit. Another reason is
that this death was accompanied by the experience of God's anger and curse,
which we by our sins had fully deserved.
Moreover, it is the promise of the
gospel that whoever believes in Christ crucified shall not perish but have
eternal life. This promise, together
with the command to repent and believe, ought to be announced and declared
without differentiation or discrimination to all nations and people, to whom
God in His good pleasure sends the gospel.
However, that many who have been
called through the gospel do not repent or believe in Christ but perish in
unbelief is not because the sacrifice of Christ offered on the cross is
deficient or insufficient, but because they themselves are at fault.
But all who genuinely believe and are
delivered and saved by Christ's death from their sins and from destruction
receive this favour solely from God's grace__which He owes to no one__given to
them in Christ from eternity.
For it was the entirely free plan and
very gracious will and intention of God the Father that the enlivening and
saving effectiveness of His Son's costly death should work itself out in all
His chosen ones, in order that He might grant justifying faith to them only and
thereby lead them without fail to salvation.
In other words, it was God's will that Christ through the blood of the
cross (by which He confirmed the new covenant) should effectively redeem from
every people, tribe, nation, and language all those and only those who were
chosen from eternity to salvation and given to Him by the Father; that He should grant them faith (which, like
the Holy Spirit's other saving gifts, He acquired for them by His death); that He should cleanse them by His blood from
all their sins, both original and actual, whether committed before or after
their coming to faith; that He should
faithfully preserve them to the very end;
and that He should finally present them to Himself, a glorious people,
without spot or wrinkle.
This plan, arising out of God's eternal
love for His chosen ones, from the beginning of the world to the present time
has been powerfully carried out and will also be carried out in the future, the
gates of hell seeking vainly to prevail against it. As a result the chosen are gathered into one,
all in their own time, and there is always a church of believers founded on
Christ's blood, a church which steadfastly loves, persistently worships,
and__here and in all eternity__praises Him as her Saviour who laid down His
life for her on the cross, as a bridegroom for His bride.
Having set forth the orthodox
teaching, the Synod rejects the errors of those:
Who teach that God the Father
appointed His Son to death on the cross without a fixed and definite plan to
save anyone by name, so that the necessity, usefulness, and worth of what
Christ's death obtained could have stood intact and altogether perfect,
complete and whole, even if the redemption that was obtained had never in
actual fact been applied to any individual.
For this assertion is an insult to the
wisdom of God the Father and to the merit of Jesus Christ, and it is contrary
to Scripture. For the Saviour speaks as
follows: I lay down my life for the sheep, and I know them (John 10:15,
27). And Isaiah the prophet says
concerning the Saviour: When He shall make Himself an offering for
sin, He shall see His offspring, He shall prolong His days, and the will of
Jehovah shall prosper in His hand (Isaiah 53:10). Finally, this undermines the article of the
creed in which we confess what we believe concerning the church.
Who teach that the purpose of Christ's
death was not to establish in actual fact a new covenant of grace by His blood,
but only to acquire for the Father the mere right to enter once more into a
covenant with men, whether of grace or of works.
For this conflicts with Scripture,
which teaches that Christ has become the
guarantee and mediator of a better__that
is, a new__covenant (Hebrews
7:22; 9:15), and that a will is in force only when someone has
died (Hebrews 9:17).
Who teach that Christ, by the
satisfaction which He gave, did not certainly merit for anyone salvation itself
and the faith by which this satisfaction of Christ is effectively applied to salvation,
but only ac-quired for the Father the authority or plenary will to relate in a
new way with men and to impose such new conditions as He chose, and that the
satisfying of these conditions depends on the free choice of man; consequently, that it was possible that
either all or none would fulfill them.
For they have too low an opinion of
the death of Christ, do not at all acknowledge the foremost fruit or benefit
which it brings forth, and summon back from hell the Pelagian error.
Who teach that what is involved in the
new covenant of grace which God the Father made with men through the
intervening of Christ's death is not that we are justified before God and saved
through faith, insofar as it accepts Christ's merit, but rather that God,
having withdrawn His demand for perfect obedience to the law, counts faith
itself, and the imperfect obedience of faith, as perfect obedience to the law,
and graciously looks upon this as worthy of the reward of eternal life.
For they contradict Scripture: They are
justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came by Jesus Christ,
whom God presented as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in His blood
(Romans 3:2425). And along with the
ungodly Socinus, they introduce a new and foreign justification of man before
God, against the consensus of the whole church.
Who teach that all people have been
received into the state of reconciliation and into the grace of the covenant,
so that no one on account of original sin is liable to condemnation, or is to
be condemned, but that all are free from the guilt of this sin.
For this opinion conflicts with
Scripture which asserts that we are by nature children of wrath.
Who make use of the distinction
between obtaining and applying in order to instil in the unwary and
inexperienced the opinion that God, as far as He is concerned, wishes to bestow
equally upon all people the benefits which are gained by Christ's death; but that the distinction by which some rather
than others come to share in the forgiveness of sins and eternal life depends
on their own free choice (which applies itself to the grace offered
indiscriminately) but does not depend on the unique gift of mercy which
effectively works in them, so that they, rather than others, apply that grace to
themselves.
For, while pretending to set forth
this distinction in an acceptable sense, they attempt to give the people the
deadly poison of Pelagianism.
Who teach that Christ neither could
die, nor had to die, nor did die for those whom God so dearly loved and chose
to eternal life, since such people do not need the death of Christ.
For they contradict the apostle, who
says: Christ loved me and gave Himself
up for me (Galatians 2:20), and likewise:
Who will bring any charge against
those whom God has chosen? It is God who
justifies. Who is he that condemns? It is Christ who died, that is, for them
(Romans 8:33-34). They also contradict
the Saviour, who asserts: Ilay down My life for the sheep (John
10:15), and My command is this: Love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that one
lay down his life for his friends (John 15:12-13).
Man was originally created in the
image of God and was furnished in his mind with a true and salutary knowledge
of his Creator and things spiritual, in his will and heart with righteousness,
and in all his emotions with purity;
indeed, the whole man was holy.
However, rebelling against God at the devil's instigation and by his own
free will, he deprived himself of these outstanding gifts. Rather, in their place he brought upon
himself blindness, terrible darkness, futility, and distortion of judgment in
his mind; perversity, defiance, and
hardness in his heart and will; and
finally impurity in all his emotions.
Man brought forth children of the same
nature as himself after the fall. That
is to say, being corrupt he brought forth corrupt children. The corruption spread, by God's just
judgment, from Adam to all his descendants__except for Christ alone __not by
way of imitation (as in former times the Pelagians would have it) but by the
way of propagation of his perverted nature.
Therefore, all people are conceived in
sin and are born children of wrath, unfit for any saving good, inclined to
evil, dead in their sins, and slaves to sin;
without the grace of the regenerating Holy Spirit they are neither
willing nor able to return to God, to reform their distorted nature, or even to
dispose themselves to such reform.
There is, to be sure, a certain light
of nature remaining in man after the fall, by virtue of which he retains some
notions about God, natural things, and the difference between what is moral and
immoral, and demonstrates a certain eagerness for virtue and for good outward
behaviour. But this light of nature is
far from enabling man to come to a saving knowledge of God and conversion to
Him__so far, in fact, that man does not use it rightly even in matters of
nature and society. Instead, in various
ways he completely distorts this light, whatever its precise character, and
suppresses it in unrighteousness. In
doing so he renders himself without excuse before God.
In this respect, what is true of the
light of nature is true also of the Ten Commandments given by God through Moses
specifically to the Jews. For man cannot
obtain saving grace through the Decalogue, because, although it does expose the
magnitude of his sin and increasingly convict him of his guilt, yet it does not
offer a remedy or enable him to escape from his misery, and, indeed, weakened
as it is by the flesh, leaves the offender under the curse.
What, therefore, neither the light of
nature nor the law can do, God accomplishes by the power of the Holy Spirit,
through the Word or the ministry of reconciliation. This is the gospel about the Messiah, through
which it has pleased God to save believers, in both the Old and the New
Testament.
In the Old Testament, God revealed the
secret of His will to a small number; in
the New Testament (now without any distinction between peoples) He discloses it
to a large number. The reason for this
difference must not be ascribed to the greater worth of one nation over
another, or to a better use of the light of nature, but to the free good
pleasure and undeserved love of God.
Therefore, those who receive so much grace, beyond and in spite of all
they deserve, ought to acknowledge it with humble and thankful hearts; on the other hand, with the apostle they
ought to adore (but certainly not inquisitively search into) the severity and
justice of God's judgment on the others, who do not receive this grace.
Nevertheless, all who are called
through the gospel are called seriously.
For seriously and most genuinely God makes known in His Word what is
pleasing to Him: that those who are called should come to Him. Seriously He also promises rest for their souls
and eternal life to all who come to Him and believe.
The fact that many who are called
through the ministry of the gospel do not come and are not brought to
conversion must not be blamed on the gospel, nor on Christ, who is offered
through the gospel, nor on God, who calls them through the gospel and even
bestows various gifts on them, but on the people themselves who are
called. Some in selfassurance do not
even entertain the Word of life; others
do entertain it but do not take it to heart, and for that reason, after the
fleeting joy of a temporary faith, they relapse; others choke the seed of the Word with the
thorns of life's cares and with the pleasures of the world and bring forth no
fruits. This our Saviour teaches in the
parable of the sower (Matthew 13).
The fact that others who are called
through the ministry of the gospel do come and are brought to conversion must
not be credited to man, as though one distinguishes himself by free choice from
others who are furnished with equal or sufficient grace for faith and
conversion (as the proud heresy of Pelagius maintains). No, it must be credited to God: just as from
eternity He chose His own in Christ, so within time He effectively calls them,
grants them faith and repentance, and, having rescued them from the dominion of
darkness, brings them into the kingdom of His Son, in order that they may
declare the wonderful deeds of Him who called them out of darkness into this
marvellous light, and may boast not in themselves, but in the Lord, as
apostolic words frequently testify in Scripture.
Moreover, when God carries out this
good pleasure in His chosen ones, or works true conversion in them, He not only
sees to it that the gospel is proclaimed to them outwardly, and enlightens
their minds powerfully by the Holy Spirit so that they may rightly understand
and discern the things of the Spirit of God, but, by the effective operation of
the same regenerating Spirit, He also penetrates into the inmost being of man,
opens the closed heart, softens the hard heart, and circumcises the heart that
is uncircumcised. He infuses new
qualities into the will, making the dead will alive, the evil one good, the
unwilling one willing, and the stubborn one compliant; He activates and strengthens the will so
that, like a good tree, it may be enabled to produce the fruits of good deeds.
And this is the regeneration, the new
creation, the raising from the dead, and the making alive so clearly proclaimed
in the Scriptures, which God works in us without our help. But this certainly does not happen only by
outward teaching, by moral persuasion, or by such a way of working that, after
God has done His work, it remains in man's power whether or not to be reborn or
converted. Rather, it is an entirely
supernatural work, one that is at the same time most powerful and most pleasing,
a marvellous, hidden, and inexpressible work, which is not lesser than or
inferior in power to that of creation or of raising the dead, as Scripture
(inspired by the author of this work) teaches.
As a result, all those in whose hearts God works in this marvellous way
are certainly, unfailingly, and effectively reborn and do actually
believe. And then the will, now renewed,
is not only activated and motivated by God but in being activated by God is
also itself active. For this reason, man
himself, by that grace which he has received, is also rightly said to believe
and repent.
In this life believers cannot fully
understand the way this work occurs;
meanwhile, they rest content with knowing and experiencing that by this
grace of God they do believe with the heart and love their Saviour.
In this way, therefore, faith is a
gift of God, not in the sense that it is offered by God for man to choose, but that
it is in actual fact bestowed on man, breathed and infused into him. Nor is it a gift in the sense that God
bestows only the potential to believe, but then awaits assent__ the act of
believing__from man's choice; rather, it
is a gift in the sense that He who works both willing and acting and, indeed,
works all things in all people produces in man both the will to believe and the
belief itself.
God does not owe this grace to
anyone. For what could God owe to one
who has nothing to give that can be paid back?
Indeed, what could God owe to one who has nothing of his own to give but
sin and falsehood? Therefore the person
who receives this grace owes and gives eternal thanks to God alone; the person who does not receive it either
does not care at all about these spiritual things and is satisfied with himself
in his condition, or else in selfassurance foolishly boasts about having
something which he lacks. Furthermore,
following the example of the apostles, we are to think and to speak in the most
favourable way about those who outwardly profess their faith and better their
lives, for the inner chambers of the heart are unknown to us. But for others, who have not yet been called,
we are to pray to the God who calls things that do not exist as though they
did. In no way, however, are we to pride ourselves as better than they, as
though we had distinguished ourselves from them.
However, just as by the fall man did
not cease to be man, endowed with intellect and will, and just as sin, which
has spread through the whole human race, did not abolish the nature of the
human race but distorted and spiritually killed it, so also this divine grace
of regeneration does not act in people as if they were blocks and stones; nor does it abolish the will and its
properties or coerce a reluctant will by force, but spiritually revives, heals,
reforms, and__in a manner at once pleasing and powerful__bends it back. As a result, a ready and sincere obedience of
the Spirit now begins to prevail where before the rebellion and resistance of
the flesh were completely dominant. It
is in this that the true and spiritual restoration and freedom of our will
consists. Thus, if the marvellous Maker
of every good thing were not dealing with us, man would have no hope of getting
up from his fall by his free choice, by which he plunged himself into ruin
while still standing upright.
Just as the almighty work of God by
which He brings forth and sustains our natural life does not rule out but
requires the use of means, by which God, according to His infinite wisdom and
goodness, has wished to exercise His power, so also the aforementioned
supernatural work of God by which He regenerates us in no way rules out or
cancels the use of the gospel, which God in His great wisdom has appointed to
be the seed of regeneration and the food of the soul. For this reason, the apostles and the
teachers who followed them taught the people in a godly manner about this grace
of God, to give Him the glory and to humble all pride, and yet did not neglect
meanwhile to keep the people, by means of the holy admonitions of the gospel,
under the administration of the Word, the sacraments, and discipline. So even today it is out of the question that
the teachers or those taught in the church should presume to test God by
separating what He in His good pleasure has wished to be closely joined
together. For grace is bestowed through
admonitions, and the more readily we perform our duty, the more lustrous the
benefit of God working in us usually is and the better His work advances. To Him alone, both for the means and for
their saving fruit and effectiveness, all glory is owed forever.
Amen.
Having
set forth the orthodox teaching, the Synod rejects the errors of those:
Who teach that, properly speaking, it
cannot be said that original sin in itself is enough to condemn the whole human
race or to warrant temporal and eternal punishments.
For they contradict the apostle when
he says: Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in
this way death passed on to all men because all sinned (Romans 5:12); also: The guilt followed one sin and brought
condemnation (Romans 5:16);
likewise: the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).
Who teach that the spiritual gifts or
the good dispositions and virtues such as goodness, holiness, and righteousness
could not have resided in man's will when he was first created, and therefore
could not have been separated from the will at the fall.
For this conflicts with the apostle's
description of the image of God in Ephesians 4:24, where he portrays the image
in terms of righteousness and holiness, which definitely resides in the will.
Who teach that in spiritual death the
spiritual gifts have not been separated from man's will, since the will in
itself has never been corrupted but only hindered by the darkness of the mind
and the unruliness of the emotions, and since the will is able to exercise its
innate free capacity once these hindrances are removed, which is to say, it is
able of itself to will or choose whatever good is set before it__or else not to
will or choose it.
This is a novel idea and an error and
has the effect of elevating the power of free choice, contrary to the words of
Jeremiah the prophet: The heart itself is deceitful above all
things and wicked (Jeremiah 17:9);
and of the words of the apostle: All of us also lived among them (the
sons of disobedience) at one time in the
passions of our flesh, following the will of our flesh and thoughts
(Ephesians 2:3).
Who teach that unregenerate man is not
strictly or totally dead in his sins or deprived of all capacity for spiritual
good but is able to hunger and thirst for righteousness or life and to offer
the sacrifice of a broken and contrite spirit which is pleasing to God.
For these views are opposed to the
plain testimonies of Scripture: You were dead in your transgressions and
sins (Ephesians 2:1, 5); The imagination of the thoughts of man's
heart is only evil all the time (Genesis 6:5; 8:21).
Besides, to hunger and thirst for deliverance from misery and for life,
and to offer God the sacrifice of a broken spirit is characteristic only of the
regenerate and of those called blessed (Psalm 51:17; Matthew 5:6).
Who teach that corrupt and natural man
can make such good use of common grace (by which they mean the light of nature)
or of the gifts remaining after the fall that he is able thereby gradually to
obtain a greater grace__evangelical or saving grace__as well as salvation
itself; and that in this way God, for
His part, shows Himself ready to reveal Christ to all people, since He provides
to all, to a sufficient extent and in an effective manner, the means necessary
for the revealing of Christ, for faith and for repentance.
For Scripture, not to mention the
experience of all ages, testifies that this is false: He
makes known His words to Jacob, His statutes and His laws to Israel; He has done this for no other nation, and
they do not know His laws (Psalm 147:1920);
In the past God let all nations go
their own way (Acts 14:16); They (Paul and his companions) were kept by the Holy Spirit from speaking
God's Word in Asia; and When they had come to Mysia, they tried to
go to Bithynia, but the Spirit would not allow them to (Acts 16:67).
Who teach that in the true conversion
of man new qualities, dispositions, or gifts cannot be infused or poured into
his will by God, and indeed that the faith [or believing] by which we first
come to conversion and from which we receive the name "believers" is
not a quality or gift infused by God, but only an act of man, and that it
cannot be called a gift except in respect to the power of attaining faith.
For these views contradict the Holy
Scriptures, which testify that God does infuse or pour into our hearts the new
qualities of faith, obedience, and the experiencing of His love: I will
put my law in their minds, and write it on their hearts (Jeremiah
31:33); I will pour water on the thirsty land, and streams on the dry
ground; I will pour out My Spirit on
your offspring (Isaiah 44:3); The love of God has been poured out in our
heart by the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us (Romans 5:5). They also conflict with the continuous
practice of the Church, which prays with the prophet: Convert
me, Lord, and I shall be converted (Jeremiah 31:18).
Who teach that the grace by which we
are converted to God is nothing but a gentle persuasion, or (as others explain
it) that the way of God's acting in man's conversion that is most noble and
suited to human nature is that which happens by persuasion, and that nothing
prevents this grace of moral suasion even by itself from making natural men
spiritual; indeed, that God does not
produce the assent of the will except in this manner of moral suasion, and that
the effectiveness of God's work by which it surpasses the work of Satan
consists in the fact that God promises eternal benefits while Satan promises
temporal ones.
For this teaching is entirely Pelagian
and contrary to the whole of Scripture, which recognises besides this
persuasion also another, far more effective and divine way in which the Holy
Spirit acts in man's conversion. As Ezekiel 36:26 puts it: I will
give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; and I will remove your heart of stone and
give you a heart of flesh...
Who teach that God in regenerating man
does not bring to bear that power of His omnipotence whereby He may powerfully
and unfailingly bend man's will to faith and conversion, but that even when God
has accomplished all the works of grace which He uses for man's conversion, man
nevertheless can, and in actual fact often does, so resist God and the Spirit
in their intent and will to regenerate him, that man completely thwarts his own
rebirth; and, indeed, that it remains in
his own power whether or not to be reborn.
For this does away with all effective
functioning of God's grace in our conversion and subjects the activity of
Almighty God to the will of man; it is
contrary to the apostles, who teach that we
believe by virtue of the effective
working of God's mighty strength (Ephesians 1:19), and that God fulfils the undeserved good will of His
kindness and the work of faith in us with power (2 Thessalonians 1:11), and
likewise that His divine power has given
us everything we need for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3).
Who teach that grace and free choice
are concurrent partial causes which cooperate to initiate conversion, and that
grace does not precede__in the order of causality__the effective influence of
the will; that is to say, that God does
not effectively help man's will to come to conversion before man's will itself
motivates and determines itself.
For the early church already condemned
this doctrine long ago in the Pelagians, on the basis of the words of the
apostle: It does not depend on man's willing or running but on God's mercy
(Romans 9:16); also: Who
makes you different from anyone else? and What do you have that you did not receive? (1 Corinthians
4:7); likewise: It is
God who works in you to will and act according to His good pleasure
(Philippians 2:13).
Those people whom God according to His
purpose calls into fellowship with His Son Jesus Christ our Lord and regenerates
by the Holy Spirit, He also sets free from the reign and slavery of sin, though
in this life not entirely from the flesh and from the body of sin.
Hence daily sins of weakness arise,
and blemishes cling to even the best works of God's people, giving them
continual cause to humble themselves before God, to flee for refuge to Christ
crucified, to put the flesh to death more and more by the Spirit of
supplication and by holy exercises of godliness, and to strain toward the goal
of perfection, until they are freed from this body of death and reign with the
Lamb of God in heaven.
Because of these remnants of sin
dwelling in them and also because of the temptations of the world and Satan,
those who have been converted could not remain standing in this grace if left
to their own resources. But God is
faithful, mercifully strengthening them in the grace once conferred on them and
powerfully preserving them in it to the end.
Although that power of God
strengthening and preserving true believers in grace is more than a match for the
flesh, yet those converted are not always so activated and motivated by God
that in certain specific actions they cannot by their own fault depart from the
leading of grace, be led astray by the desires of the flesh, and give in to
them. For this reason they must
constantly watch and pray that they may not be led into temptations. When they fail to do this, not only can they be carried away by the flesh,
the world, and Satan into sins, even serious and outrageous ones, but also by
God's just permission they sometimes are
so carried away__witness the sad cases, described in Scripture, of David,
Peter, and other saints falling into sins.
By such monstrous sins, however, they
greatly offend God, deserve the sentence of death, grieve the Holy Spirit,
suspend the exercise of faith, severely wound the conscience, and sometimes
lose the awareness of grace for a time__until, after they have returned to the
way by genuine repentance, God's fatherly face again shines upon them.
For God, who is rich in mercy,
according to His unchangeable purpose of election, does not take His Holy
Spirit from His own completely, even when they fall grievously. Neither does He let them fall down so far
that they forfeit the grace of adoption and the state of justification, or
commit the sin which leads to death (the sin against the Holy Spirit), and
plunge themselves, entirely forsaken by Him, into eternal ruin.
For, in the first place, God preserves
in those saints when they fall His imperishable seed from which they have been
born again, lest it perish or be dislodged.
Secondly, by His Word and Spirit He certainly and effectively renews
them to repentance so that they have a heartfelt and godly sorrow for the sins
they have committed; seek and obtain,
through faith and with a contrite heart, forgiveness in the blood of the
Mediator; experience again the grace of
a reconciled God; through faith adore
His mercies; and from then on more
eagerly work out their own salvation with fear and trembling.
So it is not by their own merits or
strength but by God's undeserved mercy that they neither forfeit faith and
grace totally nor remain in their downfalls to the end and are lost. With respect to themselves this not only
easily could happen, but also undoubtedly would happen; but with respect to God it cannot possibly
happen since His plan cannot be changed, His promise cannot fail, the calling
according to His purpose cannot be revoked, the merit of Christ as well as His
interceding and preserving cannot be nullified, and the sealing of the Holy
Spirit can neither be invalidated nor wiped out.
Concerning this preservation of those
chosen to salvation and concerning the perseverance of true believers in faith,
believers themselves can and do become assured in accordance with the measure
of their faith, by which they firmly believe that they are and always will
remain true and living members of the church, and that they have the
forgiveness of sins and eternal life.
Accordingly, this assurance does not
derive from some private revelation beyond or outside the Word, but from faith
in the promises of God which He has very plentifully revealed in His Word for
our comfort, from the testimony of the
Holy Spirit testifying with our spirit that we are God's children and heirs
(Romans 8:1617), and finally from a serious and holy pursuit of a clear
conscience and of good works. And if
God's chosen ones in this world did not have this wellfounded comfort that the
victory will be theirs and this reliable guarantee of eternal glory, they would
be of all people most miserable.
Meanwhile, Scripture testifies that
believers have to contend in this life with various doubts of the flesh and
that under severe temptation they do not always experience this full assurance
of faith and certainty of perseverance.
But God, the Father of all comfort, does
not let them be tempted beyond what they can bear, but with the temptation He
also provides a way out (1 Corinthians 10:13), and by the Holy Spirit
revives in them the assurance of their perseverance.
This assurance of perseverance,
however, so far from making true believers proud and carnally selfassured, is
rather the true root of humility, of childlike respect, of genuine godliness,
of endurance in every conflict, of fervent prayers, of steadfastness in
cross-bearing and in confessing the truth, and of wellfounded joy in God. Reflecting on this benefit provides an
incentive to a serious and continual practice of thanksgiving and good works,
as is evident from the testimonies of Scriptures and the examples of the
saints.
Neither does the renewed confidence of
perseverance produce immorality or lack of concern for godliness in those put
back on their feet after a fall, but it produces a much greater concern to
observe carefully the ways of the Lord which He prepared in advance. They observe these ways in order that by
walking in them they may maintain the assurance of their perseverance, lest, by
their abuse of His fatherly goodness, the face of the gracious God (for the
godly, looking upon His face is sweeter than life, but its withdrawal is more bitter
than death) turn away from them again, with the result that they fall into
greater anguish of spirit.
And, just as it has pleased God to
begin this work of grace in us by the proclamation of the gospel, so He
preserves, continues, and completes His work by the hearing and reading of the
gospel, by meditation on it, by its exhortations, threats, and promises, and
also by the use of the sacraments.
This teaching about the perseverance
of true believers and saints, and about their assurance of it__a teaching which
God has very richly revealed in His Word for the glory of His name and for the
comfort of the godly and which He impresses on the hearts of believers __is
something which the flesh does not understand, Satan hates, the world
ridicules, the ignorant and the hypocrites abuse and the spirits of error
attack. The bride of Christ, on the
other hand, has always loved this teaching very tenderly and defended it
steadfastly as a priceless treasure; and
God, against whom no plan can avail and no strength can prevail, will ensure
that she will continue to do this. To
this God alone, Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit, be honour and glory forever.
Amen.
Concerning the Teaching of the Perseverance of the Saints.
Having set forth the orthodox
teaching, the Synod rejects the errors of those:
Who teach that the perseverance of
true believers is not an effect of election or a gift of God produced by
Christ's death, but a condition of the new covenant which man, before what they
call his "peremptory" election and justification, must fulfill by his
free will.
For Holy Scripture testifies that
perseverance follows from election and is granted to the chosen by virtue of
Christ's death, resurrection, and intercession:
The chosen obtained it; the others were hardened (Romans
11:7); likewise, He who did not spare His own Son, but gave Him up for us all__how will He not, along with Him, grant us
all things? Who will bring any charge
against those whom God has chosen? It is
God who justifies. Who is he that
condemns? It is Christ Jesus who died__more than that, who was raised__who also sits at the right hand of God, and
is also interceding for us. Who shall
separate us from the love of Christ? (Romans 8:3235)
Who teach that God does provide the
believer with sufficient strength to persevere and is ready to preserve this
strength in him if he performs his duty, but that even with all those things in
place which are necessary to persevere in faith and which God is pleased to use
to preserve faith, it still always depends on the choice of man's will whether
or not he perseveres.
For this view is obviously
Pelagian; and though it intends to make
men free it makes them sacrilegious. It
is against the enduring consensus of evangelical teaching which takes from man
all cause for boasting and ascribes the praise for this benefit only to God's
grace. It is also against the testimony
of the apostle: It is God who keeps us strong to the end, so that we will be blameless
on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 1:8).
Who teach that those who truly believe
and have been born again not only can forfeit justifying faith as well as grace
and salvation totally and to the end, but also in actual fact do often forfeit
them and are lost forever.
For this opinion nullifies the very
grace of justification and regeneration as well as the continual preservation
by Christ, contrary to the plain words of the Apostle Paul: If
Christ died for us while we were still sinners, we will therefore much more be
saved from God's wrath through Him, since we have now been justified by His
blood (Romans 5:89); and contrary to
the apostle John: No one who is born of God is intent on sin, because God's seed remains
in him, nor can he sin, because he has been born of God (1John 3:9); also contrary to the words of Jesus
Christ: I give eternal life to My sheep and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of My hand. My Father, who has given them to Me, is
greater than all; no one can snatch them
out of My Father's hand (John 10:2829).
Who teach that those who truly believe
and have been born again can commit the sin that leads to death (the sin
against the Holy Spirit).
For the same apostle John, after
making mention of those who commit the sin that leads to death and forbidding
prayer for them (1John 5:1617), immediately adds: We know
that anyone born of God does not commit sin (that is, that kind of sin), but the one who was born of God keeps
himself safe, and the evil one does not touch him (1John 5:18).
Who teach that apart from a special
revelation no one can have the assurance of future perseverance in this life.
For by this teaching the well-founded
consolation of true believers in this life is taken away and the doubting of
the Romanists is reintroduced into the church.
Holy Scripture, however, in many places derives the assurance not from a
special and extraordinary revelation but from the marks peculiar to God's
children and from God's completely reliable promises. So especially the apostle Paul: Nothing
in all creation can separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus
our Lord (Romans 8:39); and
John: They who obey His commands remain in Him and He in them. And this is how we know that He remains in
us: by the Spirit He gave us (1 John
3:24).
Who teach that the teaching of the assurance
of perseverance and of salvation is by its very nature and character an opiate
of the flesh and is harmful to godliness, good morals, prayer, and other holy
exercises, but that, on the contrary, to have doubt about this is praiseworthy.
For these people show that they do not know the effective operation of God's grace and the work of the indwelling Holy Spirit, and they contradict the apostle John, who asserts the opposite in plain words: Dear friends, now we are children of God, but what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know
that when He is made known, we
shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies
himself, just as He is pure (1 John 3:23). Moreover, they are refuted by the examples of
the saints in both the Old and New Testament, who though assured of their
perseverance and salvation yet were constant in prayer and other exercises of
godliness.
Who teach that the faith of those who
believe only temporarily does not differ from justifying and saving faith
except in duration alone.
For Christ Himself in Matthew 13:20ff
and Luke 8:13ff clearly defines these further differences between temporary and
true believers: He says that the former
receive the seed on rocky ground, and the latter receive it in good ground, or
a good heart; the former have no root,
and the latter are firmly rooted; the
former have no fruit and the latter produce fruit in varying measure, with
steadfastness, or perseverance.
Who teach that it is not absurd that a
person, after losing his former regeneration, should once again, indeed quite
often, be reborn.
For by this teaching they deny the
imperishable nature of God's seed by which we are born again, contrary to the
testimony of the apostle Peter: Born again, not of perishable seed, but of
imperishable (1 Peter 1:23).
Who teach that Christ nowhere prayed
for an unfailing perseverance of believers in faith.
For they contradict Christ Himself
when He says: I have prayed for you, Peter, that your faith may not fail (Luke
22:32); and John the gospel writer when
he testifies in John 17 that it was not only for the apostles, but also for all
those who were to believe by their message that Christ prayed: Holy
Father, preserve them in Your name (v 11);
and My prayer is not that you take
them out of the world, but that you preserve them from the evil one (v 15).
And so this is the clear, simple, and straightforward
explanation of the orthodox teaching on the five articles in dispute in the
Netherlands, as well as the rejection of the errors by which the Dutch churches
have for some time been disturbed. This
explanation and rejection the Synod declares to be derived from God's Word and
in agreement with the confessions of the Reformed churches. Hence it clearly appears that those of whom
one could hardly expect it have shown no truth, equity, and charity at all in
wishing to make the public believe:
__that the teaching of the Reformed
churches on predestination and on the points associated with it by its very
nature and tendency draws the minds of people away from all godliness and
religion, is an opiate of the flesh and the devil, and is a stronghold of Satan
where he lies in wait for all people, wounds most of them, and fatally pierces
many of them with the arrows of both despair and selfassurance;
__that this teaching makes God the
author of sin, unjust, a tyrant, and a hypocrite; and is nothing but a refurbished Stoicism,
Manicheism, Libertinism, and Mohammedanism;
__that this teaching makes people
carnally selfassured, since it persuades them that nothing endangers the
salvation of the chosen, no matter how they live, so that they may commit the
most outrageous crimes with selfassurance;
and that on the other hand nothing is of use to the reprobate for
salvation even if they have truly performed all the works of the saints;
__that this teaching means that God
predestined and created, by the bare and unqualified choice of His will,
without the least regard or consideration of any sin, the greatest part of the
world to eternal condemnation; that in the same manner in which election is the
cause of faith and good works, reprobation is the cause of unbelief and
ungodliness; that many infant children
of believers are snatched in their innocence from their mothers' breasts and
cruelly cast into hell so that neither the blood of Christ nor their baptism
nor the prayers of the church at their baptism can be of any use to them;
and
very many other slanderous accusations of this kind which the Reformed churches
not only disavow but even denounce with their whole heart.
Therefore this Synod of Dort in the
name of the Lord pleads with all who devoutly call on the name of our Saviour
Jesus Christ to form their judgment about the faith of the Reformed churches,
not on the basis of false accusations gathered from here or there, or even on
the basis of the personal statements of a number or ancient or modern
authorities__statements which are also often either quoted out of context or
misquoted and twisted to convey a different meaning__but on the basis of the
churches' own official confessions and of the present explanation of the
orthodox teaching which has been endorsed by the unanimous consent of the
members of the whole Synod, one and all.
Moreover, the Synod earnestly warns
the false accusers themselves to consider how heavy a judgment of God awaits
those who give false testimony against so many churches and their confessions,
trouble the consciences of the weak, and seek to prejudice the minds of many
against the fellowship of true believers.
Finally, this Synod urges all fellow
ministers in the gospel of Christ to deal with this teaching in a godly and
reverent manner, in the academic institutions as well as in the churches; to do so, both in their speaking and writing,
with a view to the glory of God's name, holiness of life, and the comfort of
anxious souls; to think and also speak
with Scripture according to the analogy of faith; and, finally, to refrain from all those ways
of speaking which go beyond the bounds set for us by the genuine sense of the
Holy Scriptures and which could give impertinent sophists a just occasion to
scoff at the teaching of the Reformed churches or even to bring false
accusations against it.
May God's Son Jesus Christ, who sits
at the right hand of God and gives gifts to men, sanctify us in the truth, lead
to the truth those who err, silence the mouths of those who lay false
accusations against sound teaching and equip faithful ministers of His Word
with a spirit of wisdom and discretion, that all they say may be to the glory
of God and the building up of their hearers.
Amen.